In non blocking IO programming model, a thread blocked on data available channels, as shown below,

in python,

while True:readers, _, _ = select.select([sys.stdin, sock], [], []) # blocked select()for reader in readers:if reader is sock:print(sock.recv(1000).decode('utf-8'))else:msg = sys.stdin.readline()sock.send(msg.encode('utf-8'))

in java,

     public void run() {while(true){try{executeCycle();} catch(IOException e){e.printStackTrace();}try {Thread.sleep(100);} catch (InterruptedException e) {e.printStackTrace();}}}public void executeCycle() throws IOException {takeNewSockets();readFromSockets();writeToSockets();}

In Non-blocking IO programming model, execution flow generally follows the pattern of infinite-loop with the main(only) responsibility to find the data available channels(ready) and perform IO with the available channel.

In a scenario, where all channels are busy(for a duration), Does non-blocking IO programming model allow a thread that perform nio with/without infinite loop also to perform another CPU-bound task in same thread, for a meantime?

These APIs usually allow you to specify a timeout for the selection step. That is, the amount of time to wait for any of the channels to be ready, returning an empty set if no channel became ready in the timeout. You can also do a non-block selection that returns immediately.

in python:

while True:readers, _, _ = select.select([sys.stdin, sock], [], [], 0) # non-block select# readers could be an empty listif readers:for reader in readers:if reader is sock:print(sock.recv(1000).decode('utf-8'))else:msg = sys.stdin.readline()sock.send(msg.encode('utf-8'))else:some_other_operations() # but only when no channel is ready

Java's Selector class has similar methods like selectNow() and select(long timeout) that you can use.