I have a 1-dimensional array of data:
a = np.array([1,2,3,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,4,4,4,6,7,8])
for which I want to obtain the 68% confidence interval (ie: the 1 sigma).
The first comment in this answer states that this can be achieved using scipy.stats.norm.interval
from the scipy.stats.norm function, via:
from scipy import stats
import numpy as np
mean, sigma = np.mean(a), np.std(a)conf_int = stats.norm.interval(0.68, loc=mean, scale=sigma)
But a comment in this post states that the actual correct way of obtaining the confidence interval is:
conf_int = stats.norm.interval(0.68, loc=mean, scale=sigma / np.sqrt(len(a)))
that is, sigma is divided by the square-root of the sample size: np.sqrt(len(a))
.
The question is: which version is the correct one?
The 68% confidence interval for a single draw from a normal distribution withmean mu and std deviation sigma is
stats.norm.interval(0.68, loc=mu, scale=sigma)
The 68% confidence interval for the mean of N draws from a normal distributionwith mean mu and std deviation sigma is
stats.norm.interval(0.68, loc=mu, scale=sigma/sqrt(N))
Intuitively, these formulas make sense, since if you hold up a jar of jelly beans and ask a large number of people to guess the number of jelly beans, each individual may be off by a lot -- the same std deviation sigma
-- but the average of the guesses will do a remarkably fine job of estimating the actual number and this is reflected by the standard deviation of the mean shrinking by a factor of 1/sqrt(N)
.
If a single draw has variance sigma**2
, then by the Bienaymé formula, the sum of N
uncorrelated draws has variance N*sigma**2
.
The mean is equal to the sum divided by N. When you multiply a random variable (like the sum) by a constant, the variance is multiplied by the constant squared. That is
Var(cX) = c**2 * Var(X)
So the variance of the mean equals
(variance of the sum)/N**2 = N * sigma**2 / N**2 = sigma**2 / N
and so the standard deviation of the mean (which is the square root of the variance) equals
sigma/sqrt(N).
This is the origin of the sqrt(N)
in the denominator.
Here is some example code, based on Tom's code, which demonstrates the claims made above:
import numpy as np
from scipy import statsN = 10000
a = np.random.normal(0, 1, N)
mean, sigma = a.mean(), a.std(ddof=1)
conf_int_a = stats.norm.interval(0.68, loc=mean, scale=sigma)print('{:0.2%} of the single draws are in conf_int_a'.format(((a >= conf_int_a[0]) & (a < conf_int_a[1])).sum() / float(N)))M = 1000
b = np.random.normal(0, 1, (N, M)).mean(axis=1)
conf_int_b = stats.norm.interval(0.68, loc=0, scale=1 / np.sqrt(M))
print('{:0.2%} of the means are in conf_int_b'.format(((b >= conf_int_b[0]) & (b < conf_int_b[1])).sum() / float(N)))
prints
68.03% of the single draws are in conf_int_a
67.78% of the means are in conf_int_b
Beware that if you define conf_int_b
with the estimates for mean
and sigma
based on the sample a
, the mean may not fall in conf_int_b
with the desired
frequency.
If you take a sample from a distribution and compute the
sample mean and std deviation,
mean, sigma = a.mean(), a.std()
be careful to note that there is no guarantee that these will
equal the population mean and standard deviation and that we are assuming
the population is normally distributed -- those are not automatic givens!
If you take a sample and want to estimate the population mean and standard
deviation, you should use
mean, sigma = a.mean(), a.std(ddof=1)
since this value for sigma is the unbiased estimator for the population standard deviation.