The following program:

import multiprocessing,operator
f = operator.itemgetter(0)
# def f(*a): return operator.itemgetter(0)(*a)
if __name__ == '__main__':multiprocessing.Pool(1).map(f, ["ab"])

fails with the following error:

Process PoolWorker-1:
Traceback (most recent call last):File "/usr/lib/python3.2/multiprocessing/process.py", line 267, in _bootstrapself.run()File "/usr/lib/python3.2/multiprocessing/process.py", line 116, in runself._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)File "/usr/lib/python3.2/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 102, in workertask = get()File "/usr/lib/python3.2/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 382, in getreturn recv()
TypeError: itemgetter expected 1 arguments, got 0

Why do I get the error (on cPython 2.7 and 3.2 on Linux x64), and why does it vanish if I uncomment the third line?

The problem here is that the multiprocessing module passes objects by copy into the other processes (obviously), and itemgetter objects are not copyable using any of the obvious means:

In [10]: a = operator.itemgetter(0)
Out[10]: copy.copy(a)
TypeError: itemgetter expected 1 arguments, got 0In [10]: a = operator.itemgetter(0)
Out[10]: copy.deepcopy(a)
TypeError: itemgetter expected 1 arguments, got 0In [10]: a = operator.itemgetter(0)
Out[10]: pickle.dumps(a)
TypeError: can't pickle itemgetter objects# etc.

The problem isn't even attempting to call f inside the other processes; it's trying to copy it in the first place. (If you look at the stack traces, which I omitted above, you'll see a lot more information on why this fails.)

Of course usually this doesn't matter, because it's nearly as easy and efficient to construct a new itemgetter on the fly as to copy one. And this is what your alternative "f" function is doing. (Copying a function that creates an itemgetter on the fly doesn't require copying an itemgetter, of course.)

You could turn "f" into a lambda. Or write a trivial function (named or lambda) that does the same thing without using itemgetter. Or write an itemgetter replacement that is copyable (which obviously wouldn't be all that hard). But you can't directly use itemgetter objects as-is the way you want to.